KARL JASPERS FORUM
TA91 (Müller)
Commentary 12
CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVES TO THE SPACETIME MODEL OF REALITY
by Adhanom Andemicael
21 March 2007, posted 24 March 2007
<1>
Where do quantum observations "occur"? Do they occur within a
four-dimensional structure (i.e., within spacetime)?
<2>
We know that a
brain in a vat can experience a 3D world "out there." But where *exactly* does
this perceived, 3D world "exist"? (Does it exist somewhere "inside" a
four-dimensional framework?)
<3>
As we know, the
"spacetime" model (i.e., representation) of reality is very useful. However,
when discussing consciousness and the strange "world" of mental phenomena, it
might be more useful to consider alternative representations of reality.
***
THE SET-THEORETICAL MODEL
<4>
How do the quantum
observations of two people relate to one another?
<5>
Let us consider
two individuals, Ann and Betty. In the spacetime model of reality, Ann's
observations relate to Betty's observations in a particular way: Their
observations are defined as "3D slices" of a common, 4D space (i.e.,
spacetime).(1)
<6>
In this article, I
consider an alternative model of reality: The set-theoretical (ST)
representation.(2) In the ST model, observations do not exist within a common
physical space.
***
<7>
Let us consider
our observer Ann. During the course of her lifetime ("L(A)"), Ann perceives a
succession of 3D images.
<8>
However, according
to quantum theory, there are many alternative sequences of 3D images that she
can observe over the period L(A).
<9>
Let the symbols
a1, a2, a3, etc. represent these various sequences of 3D images. Together, a1,
a2, a3, etc. make up a set that we can call "Set-A."
<10>
Thus: Set-A =
{a1, a2, a3, etc.}.
<11>
Quantum theory
permits Ann to observe any one of these sequences over the period L(A).(3)
<12>
Betty, our second
observer, has a lifetime L(B). Betty observes a succession of 3D images over the
duration L(B).
<13>
However,
according to quantum theory, there are many alternative sequences of 3D images
that she can observe over the period L(B).
<14>
Let the symbols
b1, b2, b3, etc. represent these various sequences of 3D images. Together, b1,
b2, b3, etc. make up a set that we can call "Set-B."
<15>
Thus: Set-B =
{b1, b2, b3, etc.}.
<16>
Quantum theory
permits Betty to observe any one of these sequences over the period L(B).
<17>
Suppose Ann
observes the sequence a2 over the duration L(A); and suppose Betty observes the
sequence b3 over L(B).
<18>
Then we can
define Set-O as follows: Set-O = {a2, b3}. This is the set of "sequences of 3D
images" that are actually observed. Set-O consists of the elements a2 and
b3.
EXTENDING THE MODEL
<19>
The
set-theoretical model described above can easily be extended to represent any
number of observers. For example, we can add two more observers, Chris and
David. So we now have a reality consisting of four observers: Ann, Betty, Chris,
and David.
<20>
L(A) represents
Ann's lifetime. L(B) represents Betty's lifetime. L(C) represents Chris's
lifetime. And L(D) represents David's lifetime.
<21>
In this scenario,
we have a total of five sets. Here are the first four:
1. Set-A = {a1, a2, a3, etc.}
2. Set-B = {b1, b2, b3, etc.}
3. Set-C = {c1, c2, c3, etc.}
4. Set-D = {d1, d2, d3, etc.}
<22>
(Note: Ann can
observe any one of the sequences in Set-A over the duration L(A). Betty can
observe any one of the sequences in Set-B over the duration L(B). Chris can
observe any one of the sequences in Set-C over the duration L(C). And David can
observe any one of the sequences in Set-D over the duration L(D).)
<23>
Let us suppose
the following: Ann observes a2 over the duration L(A); Betty observes b3 over
L(B); Chris observes c1 over L(C); and David observes d3 over L(D).
<24>
Then we can
define the fifth set (Set-O) as follows:
<25>
Set-O = {a2, b3,
c1, d3}. This is the set of "sequences of 3D images" that are actually observed.
This set represents reality as it is experienced by the above four individuals
over the course of their lives.
<26>
We can combine
elements from the first four sets in many different ways to create the fifth
set, Set-O. The set of all such combinations constitutes a class, Class-T.
<27>
The elements
(i.e., quadruplets) in Class-T that are permitted by the laws of quantum theory
constitute a class, Class-P. Class-P is a subclass of Class-T.(4)
NOTES
1. The spacetime model makes the following three assumptions: a) Many
observers exist; b) each individual makes his or her own observations of
reality; c) the observations of several individuals "fit together" to form a
"self-consistent network of observations."
2. I do not know if the set-theoretical model described in this article
resembles Professor Hitoshi Kitada's theory in any way.
(<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/time>)
3. Quantum theory describes a strange reality of "wave-particles,"
"uncertainties," and "probabilities of events." "Four-dimensional spacetime"
might not "belong" in this world of quantum concepts. We should consider
abstract alternatives to the spacetime model of reality.
4. Class-T is the totality of possible quadruplets. Class-P is the class of
quadruplets that are permitted by the laws of quantum mechanics.
***
TIME TRAVEL
Scenario S1
<28>
Let us suppose
the following:
-- Ann observes a sequence of 3D images [I(A)-1, I(A)-2, I(A)-3].(1)
-- She perceives these images over the course of a few moments of
subjective/psychological time.(2)
-- Each image contains an observable clock.
-- The clock in image I(A)-1 indicates 2010AD.
-- The clock in image I(A)-2 indicates 2000AD.
-- The clock in image I(A)-3 indicates 2020AD.
<29>
This scenario
(S1) seems logically possible in the set-theoretical model.(3) However, S1 does
not seem possible in the spacetime model.(4)
NOTES
1. Quantum time travel is discussed at the following site:
http://tph.tuwien.ac.at/~svozil/publ/2005-tt.pdf
2. For an analysis of subjective time, please see Section IV of my paper
"Temporal Passage":
http://www.kjf.ca/61-TAAND.htm
3. The set-theoretical model places no restrictions on what individuals can
perceive.
We can use the laws of quantum mechanics to predict what people actually
observe in various circumstances.
4. Logical inconsistencies arise in the spacetime model because observations
exist within a common 4D space.
Target Article 61
http://www.kjf.ca/61-TAAND.htm
http://www.KJF.ca
http://www.KJF.ca/69-C32AN.htm
http://www.KJF.ca/69-C34AN.htm
http://www.KJF.ca/77-C13AN.htm
http://www.KJF.ca/79-C34AN.htm
http://www.KJF.ca/79-C42AN.htm
http://www.KJF.ca/79-C45AN.htm
http://www.KJF.ca/81-82-C41AN.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Adhanom Andemicael
e-mail
<Andemicael@worldnet.att.net>